17 February, 2012

LANE 333 - Morphemes

A. Definition of Morpheme:
_A morpheme is a short segment of language that meets three criteria:
1.    It is a word or a part of a word that has meaning.
2.    It cannot be divided into smaller meaningful parts without violation of its meaning or without meaningless remainders.
3.    It recurs in differing verbal environments with a relatively stable meaning.
Examining the word straight /stret/:
_ In the light of the three criteria, we find out that:
1.    We recognize it as a word and can find it listed as such in any dictionary.
2.    It cannot be divided without violation of meaning;
The word ‘straight’ /stret/:
a.    /tret/as in trait , /-s/ remains,
b.    */ret/as in rate, /-st/ remains,
c.     */et/as in ate./-str-/ remains.
The leftovers of these parts: /-s/,/st-/, and /str-/ violate the meaning of straight.
Furthermore, if we divide it in these ways, we will get the meaningless remainders of /-s/, /st-/, or /str-/.
3.    It recurs with relatively stable meaning in such environments as straightedge, straighten, and a straight line.
_ Thus, the word ‘straight’ meets all the criteria of a morpheme.
Examining /-ǝn/ in the word brighten /brait-ǝn/:
_ In the light of the three criteria, we find out that:
1.    We recognize it as a part of the word brighten /brait-ǝn/, and when we compare the morpheme bright to the word brighten, we realize that the addition of /-ǝn/ added the sense of ‘make’ in brighten. So /-ǝn/ means ‘make’. Thus, /-ǝn/ is a part of a word and has meaning.
2.    It cannot be divided into smaller meaningful units.
3.    It recurs with a stable meaning in wors such as : cheapen, deepen, soften, and stiffen.
_ Therefore, /-ǝn/ must be considered a morpheme. So brighten contain two morphemes: bright and –en.

B. Free and Bound Morphemes:

A FREE MORPHEME is one that can be uttered alone with meaning.
Examples:
•      straight
•      bright
•      bird
•      happy
• A BOUND MORPHEME, unlike the free, cannot be uttered alone with meaning. It is always annexed to one or more morpheme to form a word.
Examples:
·       -s as in books,
·       -er as in reader,
·       re- as in reread.
C. Bases:
Another classification of morphemes puts them into two classes: Bases and affixes.
_ A base morpheme is the part of a word that has the principal meaning: e.g. denial, lovable.
Bases are very numerous and most of them are free morphemes; but some are bound, like -sent in consent, dissent, and assent. A word may contain one base and one or more affixes as in ‘unmistakable’: un-mis-tak-able has the free base take and the prefixes un- and mis-, as well as the suffix –able.
A base is a linguistic form that meets one or more of these requirements:
1.    It can occur as an immediate constituent of a word whose only other immediate constituent is a prefix or suffix. EXAMPLES: react, active, fertilize
2.    It is an allomorph of a morpheme which has another allomorph that is a free form.
EXAMPLES: depth (deep), wolves (wolf).
3.    It is a borrowing from another language in which it is a free form or a base.
EXAMPLES: biometrics, microcosm, phraseology.

D. Difficulties in Morphemic Analysis:

1.    The first difficulty is that you have your own individual stock of morphemes. For example, Tom may think of automobile as one morpheme meaning “car", whereas Dick may know the morphemes auto (self) and mobile (moving), and recognize them in other words like autograph and mobilize.
2.    The second difficulty is that persons may know a given morpheme but differ in the degree to which they are aware of its presence in various words. For example, the agentive suffix (spelled –er, -or, -ar) meaning “one who, that which”, and recognize it in words like singer and actor but what about in professor and sweater .
3.     Another problem results from the fact that metaphors die as language changes. For example, the morpheme –prehend– in apprehend used to mean “to arrest or seize”, but in comprehend the metaphor seems to be dead, and the meaning of the word today is merely ‘understand’.
4.     Additive meaning is a problem in itself. For example: the morpheme pose (place) in ‘pose a question’ and interpose (place between), the meaning is clear but not valid in suppose, repose.
E.  Affixes:
_An affix is a bound morpheme that occurs before or within or after a base. An affix can be either derivational or inflectional.
_ In English, affixes are of three types:
1. prefixes,
2. infixes,
3. suffixes.

Types of affixes:
1.    Prefixes are those bound morphemes that occur before a base, as in import, prefix, reconsider. Prefixes in English are a small class of morphemes, numbering about 75.
2.    Infixes are bound morphemes that have been inserted within a word. In English, infixes are rare. Occasionally they are additions within a word.
3.    Suffixes are bound morphemes that occur after a base, like shrinkage, failure. Suffixes may pile up to the number or three or four e.g. in ‘formalizers’: the base form + the four suffixes -al, -ize, -er, -s, whereas prefixes are commonly single, except for the negative un- before another prefix.
Derivational Affixes:
Derivational affixes serve to alter the meaning of a word by building on a base. For example, the addition of the prefix un- to the word ‘happy’ changes the meaning of ‘happy’. The resulting word ‘unhappy’ means "not happy", another example the addition of the suffix -er to the word ‘write’ changes the meaning of ‘write’, which refers to the action of writing to a word that refers to 'a person who performs the action of writing’. ALL PREFIXES in English are derivational. However, suffixes may be either derivational or inflectional.

Inflectional Affixes:

In contrast to derivational affixes there are only eight "inflectional affixes" in English, and all of them are suffixes. Inflectional suffixes indicate grammatical categories when added to a specific class of words.
Representing morphemes:
Morphemes are normally represented using their most common English spelling surrounded by curly brackets { }: for instance, the morpheme in the simple word dog is represented {dog}. This is called morphemic transcription. It refers to the meaning, not the pronunciation. If the same morpheme has multiple pronunciations, as with the plural –s, pronounced /s/ in words like cats and /z/ in words like dogs, the same transcriptions will be used. So cats would be represented as {cat} + {-s pl} and {dogs} would be represented {dog} + {-s pl}.


F.  Inflectional Suffixes:

The words to which these affixes are attached are called stems. The stem includes the base or bases and all the derivational affixes. Thus the stem of cowboys is cowboy and that of classified is classify.
•The inflectional suffixes differ from the derivational suffixes in the following ways:
1.    They do not change the class of words.                                                                          Example: cold , colder (both adjectives)
2.    They come last in a word.
            Example: shortened.
3.    They go with all stems in that class of words.                                                                       Examples: He eats, drinks, dreams.
4.    They do not pile up; only one ends a word.
            Example: books, working, higher.
An exception is {-s pl ps}, the plural possessive of the noun, as in “the students’ worries”.

G. Derivational Suffixes:

The common characteristics of derivational suffixes are :
1.    The words with which derivational suffixes combine is an arbitrary matter. For example, when the noun is derived from the verb govern we must add -ment,
2.    In many cases, but not all, a derivational suffix changes the class of the word to which it is added. For example, the noun act becomes an adjective by the addition of –ive.
3.    Derivational suffixes usually do not close off a word; that is, after a derivational suffix one can sometimes add another derivational suffix.
Derivation & Inflection:
In grammatical study, it is often necessary to examine families of related words. Such families are linguistically known as paradigms.
A paradigm is a set of related forms having the same base but different affixes. There are two kinds of paradigms:
1.    Derivation Paradigm, and
2.    Inflection Paradigm.
• The derivational paradigm is a set of related words composed of the same base morpheme and all the derivational affixes that can go with this base.
Example: Some examples of noun-marking derivational suffixes are –hood, -ship, -ness, and –ment. Words having these endings are recognized, even in isolation, as nouns. (1999, Herndon)
•A class of words with similar inflection rules is called an inflectional paradigm. Typically, the similar rules amount to a unique set of affixes.
The inflectional paradigm is formed by words to which the inflectional suffixes are attached.
1. Inflectional suffixes do not change the part of speech.
2. Inflectional suffixes come last in a word when they are present.
3. They go with all stems of a given part of speech.
4. They do not pile up as one inflectional morpheme closes a word.
Example: the inflectional paradigm for the class form (NOUNS) is made up as follows:


13 February, 2012

LANE 333 - English Morphology

What is English Morphology?
1.1 What is morphology?
The term morphology is generally attributed to the German poet, novelist, playwright, and philosopher Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832), who coined it early in the nineteenth century in a biological context. Its etymology is Greek: morph- means ‘shape, form’, and morphology is the study of form or forms. In biology morphology refers to the study of the form and structure of organisms, and in geology it refers to the study of the configuration and evolution of land forms. In linguistics morphology refers to the mental system involved in word formation or to the branch of linguistics that deals with words, their internal structure, and how they are formed.
1.2 Morphemes
A major way in which morphologists investigate words, their internal structure, and how they are formed is through the identification and study of morphemes, often defined as the smallest linguistic pieces with a grammatical function. This definition is not meant to include all morphemes, but it is the usual one and a good starting point. A morpheme may consist of a word, such as hand, or a meaningful piece of a word, such as the –ed of looked, that cannot be divided into smaller meaningful parts. We can identify a morpheme by three criteria:
1. It is a word or part of a word that has meaning.
2. It cannot be divided into smaller meaningful parts without violation of its meaning or without meaningless remainders.
3. It recurs in differing word environments with a relatively stable meaning.
Take the word straight /stret/. It is obviously recognised as a word by English speakers. Although we can divide it up in all sorts of ways (trait /tret/, rate /ret/, ate /et/), they all mean something different and leave us with meaningless remainders like /s-/, /st-/, and /str-/. The unit /stret/ occurs with relatively stable meaning in words like straighten, a straight line, and straightedge. Thus it fits the criteria for a morpheme. Likewise, consider the words bright (light) and brighten (make light). We might conclude that the –en in brighten is a morpheme with a causative meaning, and we certainly find that elsewhere in words like deepen, soften, stiffen. You may also run across the term morph. The term ‘morph’ is sometimes used to refer specifically to the phonological realization of a morpheme. For example, the English past tense morpheme that we spell -ed has various morphs. It is realized as [t] after the voiceless [p] of jump (jumped), as [d] after the voiced [l] of repel (repelled), and as [ǝd] after the voiceless [t] of root or the voiced [d] of wed (rooted and wedded).
We can also call these morphs allomorphs or variants. The appearance of one morph over another in this case is determined by voicing and the place of articulation of the final consonant of the verb stem.
Now consider the word reconsideration. We can break it into three morphemes: re-, consider, and -ation. Consider is called the stem. A stem is a base morpheme to which another morphological piece is attached. The stem can be simple, made up of only one part, or complex, itself made up of more than one piece. Here it is best to consider consider a simple stem.
Although it consists historically of more than one part, most present-day speakers would treat it as an unanalyzable form. We could also call consider the root. A root is like a stem in constituting the core of the word to which other pieces attach, but the term refers only to morphologically simple units. For example, disagree is the stem of disagreement, because it is the base to which -ment attaches, but agree is the root. Taking disagree now, agree is both the stem to which dis- attaches and the root of the entire word.
Returning now to reconsideration, re- and -ation are both affixes, which means that they are attached to the stem. Affixes like re- that go before the stem are prefixes, and those like -ation that go after are suffixes.

Thus another classificatory distinction must be made between roots, stems and bases. Roots are content morphemes that cannot be further divided into smaller morphemic parts. A root need not be a free standing word. Thus, both {lav-} in lavando and {burden} in unburden are roots; the latter being a free root and the former being a bound root. A base is anything that an affix attaches to. For example, in the word unlovable, love is the base for lovable, and lovable is the base for unlovable. A stem is a base to which inflectional affixes attach. Thus, {lav-} and {burden} are at the same time roots, stems, and bases. They are roots because they cannot be reduced to any smaller morphemic units. They are stems because inflectional affixes can be directly concatenated to them. They are bases because complex words can be derived from them by adding additional affixes. Contrasting prefixed words like unhappy and repaint to prefixed words like receive and deflect. The former are derived from free bases, {happy} and {paint} respectively, while the latter are derived from bound bases, {-ceive} and {-flect} respectively. Strictly speaking, all of these morphemes are roots since they all take derivational prefixes. They are all bases since larger words are built of them.
Sources:
Aronoff, Mark; Fudeman, Kirsten. 2005. What is Morphology?,Blackwell Publishing.
Melinger, Alissa. Morphological Complexity in English Prefixed Words: An Experimental Investigation, A PH. D dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of State University of New York at Buffalo:
          http://wings.buffalo.edu/linguistics/people/students/dissertations/melinger_diss.pdf